Thursday, June 27, 2024

U.S. Supreme Court, SEC v. Jarkesy, Docket No. 22-859


Practice

 

 

The dissent also appeals to practice, ignoring that the statute Jarkesy and Patriot28 have been prosecuted under is barely over a decade old. It is also unclear how practice could transmute a private right into a public one, or how the absence of legal challenges brought by one generation could waive the individual rights of the next. Practice may be probative when it reflects the settled institutional understandings of the branches. That case is far weaker when the rights of individuals are directly at stake.

 

 

(U.S. Supreme Court, June 27, 2024, SEC v. Jarkesy, Docket No. 22-859, C.J. Roberts)

No comments:

Post a Comment